Line Check A320
Course Status
*
Initial
Recurrentl
Rank
*
Capt
F/O
DATE
*
/
Day
/
Month
Year
Date
FLIGHT NO. JZR:
*
Aircraft Regn.
*
Please Select
CAI
CAJ
CAK
CAL
CAM
CAN
CAO
CAP
CAR
CAS
CAT
CAV
CAW
CBA
CBB
CBC
CBD
CBE
CBF
CBG
CBH
CBI
CBJ
CBK
Trainee Name
*
Trainee S/No:
*
Trainee LIC No.:
*
TRI/TRE/LTC Staff No:
*
TRI/TRE/LTC Name:
*
TRI/TRE/LTC Auth No.:
*
Authority Validity
*
TRI/TRE/LTC Seat
*
LHS
RHS
Rear
Flight Details
*
Rows
Sector
R/W
APP.AID
D/N
Weather
PF/PM
HRS
MINs
Sector 1
Sector 2
Flight Details (Sector 3) If Applicable
Rows
Sector
R/W
APP.AID
D/N
Wind/Visibility & ceiling
PF/PM
HRS
MINs
Sector 3
Total Time:
*
Hour Minutes
Back
Next
1. Reporting Time / Appearance
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
2. Documents
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
3. Flight Preparation
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
4. Performance Data
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
5. A/C Documents
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
6. Exterior Walkaround
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
7. Cockpit Preparation
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
8. Departure Briefing
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
9. Taxi
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
10. Take-Off Technique
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
11. Departure /Climb
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
12. Cruise
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
13. Wx Avoidance / Turbulence / Anti-Ice
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
14. Arrival Briefing
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
15. Descent Planning
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
Back
Next
16. Approach / Go-Around
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
17. Landing
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
18. Use of Brakes / Reverses
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
19. Taxi / Parking
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
20. MEL / Abnormalities
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
21. Passenger (PA) / Staff Liaison
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
22. CAT II / III
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
23. PLCA (if applicable)
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
24. Proper use of EFB
*
Rows
Grade
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
N/A
Back
Next
Competencies
Competencies: KNO
*
Rows
Comment
KNO
5. The pilot had EXEMPLARY knowledge, by always demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which significantly enhanced safety effectiveness and efficiency.
4. The pilot had EFFECTIVE knowledge, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety.
3. The pilot had ADEQUATE knowledge, by frequently demonstrating many of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation.
2. The pilot had knowledge at the MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LEVEL, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation.
1. NOT YET COMPETENT as the pilot did not have adequate knowledge, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation.
N/A
KNO O.Bs
KNO Grade
Competencies: PRO
*
Rows
Comment
PRO
5. The pilot applied procedures in an EXEMPLARY manner, by always demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which significantly enhanced safety effectiveness and efficiency.
4. The pilot applied procedures EFFECTIVELY, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety.
3. The pilot applied procedures ADEQUATELY, by frequently demonstrating many of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation.
2. The pilot applied procedures at the MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LEVEL, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation.
1. NOT YET COMPETENT as the pilot did not apply procedures correctly, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation.
N/A
PRO O.Bs
PRO Grade
Competencies: COM
*
Rows
Comment
COM
5. The pilot communicated in an EXEMPLARY manner, by always demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which significantly enhanced safety effectiveness and efficiency.
4. The pilot communicated EFFECTIVELY, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety.
3. The pilot communicated ADEQUATELY, by frequently demonstrating many of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation.
2. The pilot communicated at the MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LEVEL, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation.
1. NOT YET COMPETENT as the pilot did not communicate correctly, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation.
N/A
COM O.Bs
COM Grade
Competencies: FPA
*
Rows
Comment
FPA
5. The pilot managed the automation in an EXEMPLARY manner, by always demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which significantly enhanced safety effectiveness and efficiency.
4. The pilot managed the automation EFFECTIVELY, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety.
3. The pilot managed the automation ADEQUATELY, by frequently demonstrating many of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation.
2. The pilot managed the automation at the MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LEVEL, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation.
1. NOT YET COMPETENT as the pilot did not manage the automation correctly, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation.
N/A
FPA O.Bs
FPA Grade
Competencies: FPM
*
Rows
Comment
FPM
5. The pilot controlled the aircraft in an EXEMPLARY manner, by always demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which significantly enhanced safety effectiveness and efficiency.
4. The pilot controlled the aircraft EFFECTIVELY, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety.
3. The pilot controlled the aircraft ADEQUATELY, by frequently demonstrating many of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation.
2. The pilot controlled the aircraft at the MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LEVEL, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation.
1. NOT YET COMPETENT as the pilot did not control the aircraft correctly, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation.
N/A
FPM O.Bs
FPM Grade
Competencies: LTW
*
Rows
Comment
LTW
5. The pilot led and worked as a team member in an EXEMPLARY manner, by always demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which significantly enhanced safety effectiveness and efficiency.
4. The pilot led and worked as a team member EFFECTIVELY, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety.
3. The pilot led and worked as a team member ADEQUATELY, by frequently demonstrating many of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation.
2. The pilot led and worked as a team member at the MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LEVEL, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall, did not result in an unsafe situation.
1. NOT YET COMPETENT as the pilot did not lead and work as a team member correctly, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation.
N/A
LTW O.Bs
LTW Grade
Competencies: PSD
*
Rows
Comment
PSD
5. The pilot solved problems and made decisions in an EXEMPLARY manner, by always demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which significantly enhanced safety effectiveness and efficiency.
4. The pilot solved problems and made decisions EFFECTIVELY, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety.
3. The pilot solved problems and made decisions ADEQUATELY, by frequently demonstrating many of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation.
2. The pilot solved problems and made decisions at the MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LEVEL, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall, did not result in an unsafe situation.
1. NOT YET COMPETENT as the pilot did not solve problems or make decisions correctly, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation.
N/A
PSD O.Bs
PSD Grade
Competencies: SAW
*
Rows
Comment
SAW
5. The pilot’s situation awareness was EXEMPLARY manner, by always demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which significantly enhanced safety effectiveness and efficiency.
4. The pilot’s situation awareness was EFFECTIVELY, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety.
3. The pilot’s situation awareness was ADEQUATELY, by frequently demonstrating many of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation.
2. The pilot’s situation awareness was at the MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LEVEL, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall, did not result in an unsafe situation.
1. NOT YET COMPETENT as the pilot’s situation awareness was not adequate, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation.
N/A
SAW O.Bs
SAW Grade
Competencies: WLM
*
Rows
Comment
WLM
5. The pilot managed the workload in an EXEMPLARY manner, by always demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which significantly enhanced safety effectiveness and efficiency.
4. The pilot managed the workload EFFECTIVELY, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety.
3. The pilot managed the workload ADEQUATELY, by frequently demonstrating many of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation.
2. The pilot managed the workload at the MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LEVEL, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation.
1. NOT YET COMPETENT as the pilot did not manage the workload effectively, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation.
N/A
WLM O.Bs
WLM Grade
Back
Next
TRI/TRE/LTC Comments
*
Result
*
Satisfactory
Fail
Trainee Name
*
Trainee Signature
*
TRI / TRE / LTC Name
*
TRI / TRE / LTC Signature
*
HOT Airline Operations Signature
HOT Airline Operations Comments
HOT Airline Operations Signature
Preview PDF
Submit
Should be Empty: