Trainee Name
*
Trainee Staff Number
*
INSTRUCTOR FILE
Back
Next
FFS
DAY 1 OR 2
*
TRAINEE NAME
*
Rank
*
CAPT
F/O
Trainee Staff Number
*
Seat
LHS
RHS
Rear
Instructor Staff Number
*
INSTRUCTOR NAME
*
Seat
LHS
RHS
Rear
DATE
*
/
Day
/
Month
Year
2 digit day, 2 digit month, 4 digit year
Date
5. TAXI
BRAKE
LGCIU
9. During Climb At 10.000 FT
FCU 1+2
FMGC 1+2
12. DUAL HYDRAULIC FAILURE
G
Y
B
Competency Assessment
KNO
*
Rows
select
Grade
1. The pilot did not have adequate knowledge, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation
2 .The pilot had knowledge of a minimum acceptable level, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation
3. The pilot had adequate knowledge, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation
4.The pilot had good knowledge, by regularly demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety.
KNO Grade
*
APK
*
Rows
select
Grade
1. The pilot did not apply procedures correctly, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation
2. The pilot applied procedures at the minimum acceptable level, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation
3. The pilot applied procedures adequately, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation.
4. The pilot applied procedures effectively, by regularly demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety
APK Grade
*
COM
*
Rows
select
Grade
1. The pilot did not communicate effectively, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation
2. The pilot communicated at the minimum acceptable level, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation
3. The pilot communicated adequately, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation
4. The pilot communicated effectively, by regularly demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety
COM Grade
*
AUT
*
Rows
select
Grade
1. The pilot did not manage the automation effectively, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation
2. The pilot managed the automation at the minimum acceptable level, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation
3. The pilot managed the automation adequately, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation
4. The pilot managed the automation effectively, by regularly demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety
AUT Grade
*
FPM
*
Rows
select
Grade
1. The pilot did not control the aircraft effectively, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation
2. The pilot controlled the aircraft at the minimum acceptable level, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation
3. The pilot controlled the aircraft adequately, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation
4. The pilot controlled the aircraft effectively, by regularly demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety
FPM Grade
*
LTW
*
Rows
select
Grade
1. The pilot did not lead or work as a team member effectively, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation
2. The pilot led and worked as a team member at the minimum acceptable level, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation
3. The pilot led and worked as a team member adequately, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation
4. The pilot led and worked as a team member effectively, by regularly demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety
LTW Grade
*
PSD
*
Rows
select
Grade
1. The pilot did not solve problems or make decisions effectively, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation
2. The pilot solved problems and made decisions at the minimum acceptable level, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation
3. The pilot solved problems and made decisions adequately, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation
4. The pilot solved problems and made decisions effectively, by regularly demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety
PSD Grade
*
SAW
*
Rows
select
Grade
1. The pilot’s situation awareness was not adequate, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation
2. The pilot’s situation awareness was at the minimum acceptable level, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation
3. The pilot’s situation awareness was adequate, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation
4. The pilot’s situation awareness was good, by regularly demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety
SAW Grade
*
WLM
*
Rows
select
Grade
1. The pilot did not manage the workload effectively, by rarely demonstrating any of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in an unsafe situation
2. The pilot managed the workload at the minimum acceptable level, by only occasionally demonstrating some of the performance indicators when required, but which overall did not result in an unsafe situation
3. The pilot managed the workload adequately, by regularly demonstrating most of the performance indicators when required, which resulted in a safe operation
4. The pilot managed the workload effectively, by regularly demonstrating all the performance indicators when required, which enhanced safety
WLM Grade
*
Observations/ Comments (Details must be given in case of any Unsatisfactory Assessment) State Nature of Failure in comments:
GENERAL PROGRESS (cross the applicable box below)
*
GOOD PROGRESS
NORMAL PROGRESS
MAY NEED ADDITIONAL TRAINING
Instructor Name
*
Instructor Signature
*
Trainee Name
*
Trainee Email:
*
example@example.com
Trainee Signature
*
ATO Head of Training Signature
Preview PDF
Submit
Should be Empty: